
So I got an email that says, "Jeri, you are a Visionary Philosopher." It also said, "The first thing we can tell you about that is you're equally good at mathematical and verbal tasks, and learn best through experience."
... Also, they said 57% of visionary philosophers like chocolate. Isn't that retarded? I mean, big freaking deal. I bet 57% of the world likes chocolate.
I'd also like to say that it's retarded for saying I'm good at verbal tasks. Obviously, they've never seen how completely awkward I am when answering phones or odd questions.
My results said I'm an "Insightful Linguist".
71% of Insightful Linguists would be more tempted to see their main squeeze covered in whipped cream, than eat an ice cream sundae covered in whipped cream.
=)
Posted by: blogfiend on April 9, 2003 03:22 PMI'm more of a "cunning linguist".
Posted by: Roland on April 9, 2003 11:07 PMgood lord.
where'd ya get that test, jeri? i couldn't find it.
Posted by: becky on April 10, 2003 01:16 PMemode.com, i think. there was a link on o'brien's blog.
Posted by: jeri on April 10, 2003 01:24 PMI have to say that I feel like I'm not as dumb as I thought I was. Scored a 122, not once but twice. I guess you can't cheat on an IQ test... I'm also an "Insightful Linguist" .. Seems to be alot of us here.
Posted by: Teresa on June 24, 2003 03:47 PMThe emode iq test told me I was a dumb ass and to never contact them again. Did I do something wrong?
Posted by: John on June 27, 2003 09:22 AMSomebody said i was a visionary philosopher??????
Posted by: andi anderson on June 29, 2003 06:22 PMdid anyone get the 15 page report, Id like to read it if anyone has a copy they could email me?
Posted by: ben on July 3, 2003 04:45 PMHmmmmm.........I am getting a vision........I see some guy sitting in his office chuckling about how easy it was for him to make his fortune $15 at a time.
Posted by: Mary on July 10, 2003 09:42 PMhas anyone figured out what a "visionary philosopher" is?
Posted by: andy on July 21, 2003 01:25 PMYes, I know what a Visionary Philosopher is. You look at things and then you think about them. I'm a Visionary Philosopher and I prefer to study art and think it over. A friend of mine is also a Visionary Philosopher and he likes to look at women and think about them. When we get together we go to the art museum and watch women. We are the only two Visionary Philosophers that I know and that is how it works for us.
Posted by: dan on July 22, 2003 11:36 PMhey, does anyone know what the score of a visonary philosopher is?
I don't think there is a certain score for the various titles it comes up with. I got a visionary philosopher the last time I took it and my score was a 138. This test does not reveal your real IQ, and if you are very gifted, let's say about over 140, it will say you are lower then you actually are because 140 is the highest it goes. It could be 148, it's been a while since I checked, but the idea is correct. Also, this it the first time on any test I've been called something other than a mathematical genius..... even this emode's test once said it.
Posted by: David on August 12, 2003 07:52 PMI've got 135 score on Emode. I never thought of myself as being that smart. I've had plenty of failers in life that would not agree with a 135 IQ. Maybe Emode gives everyone who does the test a score above 120 just to make us feel better. I can imagine all the backlash Emode would get if they gave us all just a mere 100 score.
Posted by: stelcha on September 1, 2003 12:51 PMEven though I received a score of 135, I think that is wrong. 135 means a near genius and I'm definately not that smart. I think I'm more closer to normal at around 100. I believe the problem is I used a calculator in the math questions. I don't think we're supposed to use a calculator, we're supposed to figure it out in our heads. It didn't say one way or another on the questionaire if we can use a calculator or not. Being that I'm not a genius I should have known better.
Posted by: stelcha on September 1, 2003 08:56 PMScore 140. I"m gonna get some new business cards printed with my title Visionary Philosopher so I can pass the out to the chicks.
Posted by: Sam on September 25, 2003 09:39 PMI got the e-mode site from an e-mail ad and just took the test. I scored a 135 and read I was a Visionary Philosopher, whatever that means. It made me feel smart even though I consider myself average. I was wondering what type of work other "visionary philosophers" are doing, who took this test. I happen to be a real estate agent and a wannabe real estate investor tycoon.
Posted by: Peter on October 2, 2003 08:52 PMHey, I took the e-mode test and received a 140. So I'm another Visionary Philosopher. :-) I am actually a Civil Engineer, aka nerd.
Posted by: Julie on October 6, 2003 11:14 AMI got Visionary philospher too, with 127, i have gotten 138 and 117 on other iq tests, it really depens on how you feel, you are more concentrated not thinking in the figths you had today you get bettter score.
Anyway it said i had it cause i had logical thougth and verbal convincing skills. And its true i can convince anyone of anything i want, my logic is real high i passed all related to it on A+ on high school and university!
As of Visionary philospher, im good on assumming how thing migth happen by logic, making suppositions, guessing why things happens on wich ways, forseen the future, called anyway you want!
Posted by: Luck on October 25, 2003 05:40 PMI'm Visionary Philosoper and they gave me a 142 score. I'd bet money the average score is over 100.
I have a chemical engineering degree, a computer science degree, and I'm currently working on my masters of computer science. I worked three years as an industrial salesman way back when I was a patzer with only a chemical engineering degree. Also, while studying for my chem eng degree, I had to take a particular course five times before I passed it. So...
That's a short blurb about this Visionary Philosopher.
I can't believe no one has posted the info they purchased from emode. Come on don't be embarrassed, just post that stuff.
Posted by: Michael on October 26, 2003 03:50 PMI think visionary philosopher is the result for people who do well on math and verbal skills, while "insightful linguist" is for people who are lower in math.
Posted by: gwert on October 26, 2003 04:19 PMIm a college grad with a business degree. I got a 133 on this emode test. Ive gotten similar scores on about 5 other tests Ive taken; all of them being online. I am also a Visionary Philosopher.
Posted by: Brandon on November 2, 2003 01:42 PM"Like Plato, your exceptional math and verbal skills make you very adept at explaining things to others." I'm a sophmore civil engineering student and felt great after they told me I was a visionary philosopher at 138. I was ready to spend the 15.00 and frame the results for my friends to look at. It would look great in the folder where I should have a HS diploma. Maybe I could show it to the teacher who made me take a remedial year of college before I could begin taking classes that counted. The super genius who conjured up this idea is selling sunshine to many whose lights are out upstairs.
Posted by: Mark on November 3, 2003 05:53 PMI'm a 138 visionary philosopher too! (I DO like chocolate...)
Posted by: doofus on November 17, 2003 01:53 PMI'm a 138 visionary philosopher too! (I DO like chocolate...)
Posted by: jeebus on November 17, 2003 01:54 PMI have taken the test twice and received 127 the first time and 135 the second time. I was a visual mathematician now I am a Visionary Philosopher.
Posted by: Alicia on November 18, 2003 06:41 AMI too am a visionary philosopher. I scored 136 on the test. This is consistant with other tests I have take which are considered valid. I have an education degree and have taken courses in test validity. One of the ways to to rough check the validity of a new test is to test the test against other valid tests that have been verified in large group studies. By the way, being the visionary I am, I did not shell out the money to get the report. :)
Posted by: gritty on November 19, 2003 06:22 AMHELLO FELLOW "ROYAL ORDER OF LINGUISTS" IN OUR QUEST TO DISCOVER WHAT "WE REALLY ARE AND WHERE DO WE BELONG"? THE INSIGHTFUL LINGUIST 129 IS ACTIVELY SEARCHING FOR SUPPORT OF THE TRUTH. PLEASE SEND ONE DOLLAR ($1.00), CASH OR CHECK. SEND TO: DAVID ALLEN 4944 SW 34th TERR. FORT LAUDERDALE, FL. 33312 THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT.
Posted by: DAVID on November 23, 2003 05:12 PMIt said I was a pimptastic sexographer. IQ:8.
Posted by: TW on November 24, 2003 10:02 PMwhoahnoway,
anyways, i don't think the title of vp has much to do with math, cause it told me i was in
the 20th percentile of people doing the damn thing on math, if i read correctly, which i hardly think i did, given that insulting conclusion. however, i do think i can tell what the hell is going on now, and in the future, and i believe it leads me to be bullied by people less "visionary" than me. man, they could've made a fortune off that capitol idea.
" ...visionary p.'s, want to stop getting bullied?!...,," anyway, check out the ERIC v.p. blog thinger-magig (google search= iq test "visionary philosopher" ) highlarious.
some of the comments posted here are DAMNED funny. i scored 135 and was labeled an insightful linguist, which is quite accurate as i am an artist and a copy writer. also, i had to take an IQ test (a real one) as part of a comprehensive personality and aptitude screening for a job and my score there was 137. so i think this is probably fairly accurate. however, there are all kinds of intelligence--emotional intelligence, wisdom, heart, etc., that (i don't believe) can be determined by a test. some of the most brilliant people i know don't cope so well in life. interesting anyway, and i have read some hilarious stuff here and on other sites from people who have taken the test.
Posted by: sharon on December 8, 2003 08:15 AMAll in all the emode IQ test is accurate. I have studied our culture's obsession with mediocrity, and the link between IQ and success. My preliminary research suggests those with IQs between 120 and 130 are often career driven and likely to beleive themselves to be merely average, while 130 to 140 understand themselves to be above average but make conscious decisions not to succeed in a business sense because of their belief in the inevitability of the human experience. This also extends to reproduction. Those individuals in society who should be having children (120 and above) are not, while those that may be less likely to have high IQed offspring are reproducing at a higher rate. Of course IQ is not completely genetic and can be developed socially, so I am not suggesting those evil uses of Eugenic theory deployed by the Tyrants of the past. As an aside, IQ test are administered to children in Kindargarten to determine placement into systems such as GATE and are considered an accurate tool in determining ability (along with other "social" factors). These tests mirror the emode test. Seriously, if anyone would be so kind, if your IQ is above 120, will you please reply to the email above and let me know if you have children, and if not whether it is due to career constraints or your belief that bringing children into the world is irresponsible. I am truly interested. Provide IQ, children data, and reason for or against to lawnatedogg@yahoo.com. Thank you.
Posted by: Nathan on December 15, 2003 09:52 AMAll in all the emode IQ test is accurate. I have studied our culture's obsession with mediocrity, and the link between IQ and success. My preliminary research suggests those with IQs between 120 and 130 are often career driven and likely to beleive themselves to be merely average, while 130 to 140 understand themselves to be above average but make conscious decisions not to succeed in a business sense because of their belief in the inevitability of the human experience. This also extends to reproduction. Those individuals in society who should be having children (120 and above) are not, while those that may be less likely to have high IQed offspring are reproducing at a higher rate. Of course IQ is not completely genetic and can be developed socially, so I am not suggesting those evil uses of Eugenic theory deployed by the Tyrants of the past. As an aside, IQ test are administered to children in Kindargarten to determine placement into systems such as GATE and are considered an accurate tool in determining ability (along with other "social" factors). These tests mirror the emode test. Seriously, if anyone would be so kind, if your IQ is above 120, will you please reply to the email above and let me know if you have children, and if not whether it is due to career constraints or your belief that bringing children into the world is irresponsible. I am truly interested. Provide IQ, children data, and reason for or against to lawnatedogg@yahoo.com. Thank you.
Posted by: Nathan on December 15, 2003 09:52 AMNathan, I just scored 142. Have three kids, all of whom are smart. It's partly genetics, in addition to a lot of reading to them, and teaching Latin and piano, to develop logic and language skills at an early age. I also work as a branch manager for a bank. I think smart people should reproduce and stupid people should not but they are probably too stupid to know that. What does 'inevitability of human experience' mean?
Posted by: annie on December 30, 2003 08:38 PMwhat a load of crap
Posted by: jes on December 31, 2003 03:36 PMNate, wife and I both scored 140 (both vis. p.'s), we're chemical engineers, have two kids. Neither one of us is particularly career driven but we do all right. My wife actually did have worries about bringing children into "such a bad world". I thought that was ridiculous and talked her into it after several years. Don't think she feels that way anymore.
The "inevitability of human experience" does strike a chord with me but I'm not sure if I get your meaning.
Posted by: Bart on January 9, 2004 11:01 PMI scored 133 and was told I was a Visonary Philosopher. The thing is that my job is just that, I look at customers house plans and remodel it to get the most out of the space. Maybe thats why it comes easy to me, or maybe this test isn't even true and they are just hoping people will buy the 15 page report.
Posted by: Matt on January 11, 2004 12:06 AMMy personal throughts is Emode is a bunch of bull, giving titles of Visionary Philosopner and Insightful Linguist to many people. Granted, I got a 138, but I hold the results no higher than a horoscope in a newspaper
Posted by: Scott on January 11, 2004 12:20 PMI LOVE BEING SMART AND SEXY
I LOVE BEING SMART AND SEXY :)
I LOVE BEING SMART AND SEXY :)
I took the emode IQ test and scored 135. From the results I was deemed a "Visonary Philosopher" with alleged mathematical and logical talents. Pfffft I failed Year 8 mathematics and have been crap at Maths for as long as I can remember.
I currently work as a storeman and part time nightclub bouncer. Either IQ does not necessarily equate to life success (dependent upon one's definition of success), or is purely a measure of pure intellectual potential. The other possibility is might be that everyone is scored above 120 and it's not a true and valid representation of what i understand a standard distribution curve should be. Who knows?
I will proof read my work before I post next time :P
Posted by: Junk Yard Dog on January 21, 2004 10:53 PMI got a 138 and I, too am a Visionary Philosopher. My husband seemed quite impressed once he stopped guffawing (which I think was a trifle rude). For the record, we have 3 VERY smart kids and didn't think twice about popping 'em out. This test may or may not be accurate (eg- where are the ones who scored under 120?), but IQ tests don't really predict much about life. I think they're fun, though!
Posted by: boo on January 26, 2004 12:50 PM Here is another Visionary philosopher...ME !!
Even though I'm not quite sure if this test is true or not, one thing is that it made me feel good about myself !!
Maybe the objective of e-mode is to put a smile on your face and make it easier to pull the $15 from your pockets : )
I'm a freshman in highschool and scored a 133 on the emode test and was told to be a Visionary Philosopher. I have doubts about the accuracy of this IQ test. One because I've scored higher than quiet a few well educated college graduates. Two, because the test only included questions that involved common sense or just took some time to think about. If there's anybody younger than me that has scored better than 133 please email me, and if there are any adults that have scored lower, inform me of your level of education finished or any degrees you have acquired. I'm requesting this information to prove to myself and others that this test is inaccurate. tonykoop@hotmail.com
Posted by: Tony on February 11, 2004 09:04 PMYou realize that the whole purpose of that test is for them to make money. If you are a dumbass it will without a doubt tell you you have a higher IQ than you do, so you will be interested in getting a 15 page report. When i took it i was like, "140, im the man, let me see that report" then i realized it cost money. If i would have got a bad score i would have said, "screw this test, whats it know" and not bothered to inquire about the report. I really doubt the reliability of this test. Considering the whole reason that I took this test was because it was a pop up add, they are just out for the money, its not like i went looking for it.
Posted by: Colin on February 21, 2004 03:10 AMCheck out this link for someone's $15 report:
http://www.mauraandterry.com/moggie/tests/iq/iq.htm
Hello. I took the test. The first time I made a 118. It called me highly intelligent and that I was an Insightful Linguist. This didn't make me feel good about myself. It pissed me off because I am not a writer. I took it again and changed some answers on purpose so that maybe I would fail and get something more colorful. I made a 122 and I was still an Insightful Linguist. So if I answered questions wrong on purpose and made a higher score. What is the problem here? I just want to be an Insightful Prostitute. Anyway I just wanted to post my thoughts and my righteous anger. I hope Emode rots in hell. He ruined my life.
Posted by: Joshua on March 7, 2004 04:59 PMso i took the IQ test and i got 138!... 138...so ya another test i took said 145.. so which is it 138 or 145... and does this make me a genius?
and great im a "visionary philosopher"... that helps.. what am i supposed to do knowing that??
kayla
Posted by: kayla on March 9, 2004 06:39 PMIt's like an online single's section:
138 Visionary Philosopher (i.e., I answered the math AND verbal questions right most of the time on the eMode I.Q. test), unwilling to spend the $15 dollars needed to get the full report (must be the visionary quality of my mind, envisioning the credit card bills), looking for another V.P. with whom she can spend time philosophizing and taking more online quizzes.
Anyway.
Taking these quizzes seriously is ridiculous, mostly because they're created by a company who just wants to make money by mooching off of your boredom. Of course, if we look at the world *that* way, a whole slew of things become ridiculous so... Enjoy your I.Q.! And too bad they don't ask for it on job applications.
Posted by: Lynz on March 19, 2004 04:42 PMi got 133, another visionary philosopher,
but i dono what it is, i can only see i wrote there, these ppl are good in maths and verbal?? and hence good in explaination to others???
Im not very sure bcoz i hated maths since my high school senior, maybe due to the teacher whom i dislike! But now im taking Computer Science which is of course a lot of maths and im one of the top achiever in class, i donot know how to explain that, coz when i study i just knew how to do!
Then, im strating to speak on stage since kindergarden, getting first prize in story-telling competition since standard one, but i only got 3rd for the public speaking competition at my U previously, im extremely interested in talking, and my fren found out that that's a little too crappy and annoying too, and i loved publixc speaking and debates quite much, and of course i loved to argue with whoever.
But the explaination thing, i sometimes will explain for hours but my frens still cant get the idea, however im quite happy coz my algebra lecture praise me for giving an exellent explanation to my fren on a topic of algebra after she tried very hard top explain and i used a simple concept to explain!
So may i say this is accurate???
And one fact, i love chocolate alot, unresistable!
Anyone pls tell me what a visionary philosopher truly is, sometimes i truly think im a philosopher , but visionary???
I dowan whether i did looked at something and think?? Maybe sometimes, perphaps!
Posted by: toucan on April 17, 2004 12:21 AMi took the test and i scored a 120. i guess that is good but i wonder what is the best score. it said i was and insightful linguist. i think this is i can't make up my mind in what i want to major in because i want ot do different things
Posted by: tiffany vallien on April 24, 2004 10:58 AMMr Paul Brook,IQ 136, Visionary Philosipher
Well ive just read all the comments on here and agree with most of it. its definiately a money making rip off, but then again ive got to consider that people with an IQ of around 100 probably dont know how to use the internet never mind even think about looking for a message board and submitting comments so maybe we are all actually as intelligent as the test reports. i am a 33 year old Electrician and unhappy with my career so far, hence i am currently doing a part time degree in Electical and Electronic engineering. I do consider myself above average intelligence cos i always get 70%+ in exams without much revision. I have done a few different IQ tests before and never got below 130. Anyway enough of all that trash. Not knowing where an IQ of 136 placed me in comparison to other people i looked for some info on the net and came up with this:(p.s. from here on it is copied and pasted, not me spouting bullshit but hey according to what it says i am at the top of the tree :-) )
Half of the population have IQ’s of between 90 and 110, while 25% have higher IQ’s and 25% have lower IQ’s:
Descriptive Classifications of Intelligence Quotients
IQ Description % of Population
130+ Very superior 2.2%
120-129 Superior 6.7%
110-119 High average 16.1%
90-109 Average 50%
80-89 Low average 16.1%
70-79 Borderline 6.7%
-70 Extremely low 2.2%
Apparently, the IQ gives a good indication of the occupational group that a person will end up in, though not of course the specific occupation. In their book, Know Your Child’s IQ, Glen Wilson and Diana Grylls outline occupations typical of various IQ levels:
140 Top Civil Servants; Professors and Research Scientists.
130 Physicians and Surgeons; Lawyers; Engineers (Civil and Mechanical)
120 School Teachers; Pharmacists; Accountants; Nurses; Stenographers; Managers.
110 Foremen; Clerks; Telephone Operators; Salesmen; Policemen; Electricians.
100+ Machine Operators; Shopkeepers; Butchers; Welders; Sheet Metal Workers.
100- Warehousemen; Carpenters; Cooks and Bakers; Small Farmers; Truck and Van Drivers.
90 Laborers; Gardeners; Upholsterers; Farmhands; Miners; Factory Packers and Sorters.
its Paul talkin again from here on:
well lets face it the test was easy, e.g. most questions consisted of 4 patterns or shapes to choose from but thats what apptitude tests are about. so since i got a score of 136 that means that i got about 87% of the questions correct so i think that i will now go back and try and get every question wrong so i should get a score of about 80 then i will know if its a load of internet rip off or not ill post the results xxx
Posted by: Paul on April 27, 2004 03:40 PMi scored 125...and now i am thinking i need to be in college again..maybe a doctor? maybe a lawyer? instead of unemployed looking for work
Posted by: mike on April 27, 2004 07:59 PMI took this test and scored 133 "VP" whatever that means. Human beings for the most part are pretty much the same. We all only utilize about 10-15% of our brains. If we could somehow harness the other 80+%; we would be a completely different species; superior to our present forms.
Posted by: Chris on April 29, 2004 09:50 PMHow goes it folks? (sup) Yeah, I got 'vp' too. Also I scored like somewhere between 136 and 139...I wasn't really paying attention...I was too busy anticipating whether or not I could find any kind of satisfying, self-fulfilling career out of having a 136-9 IQ...I like to think, read, listen to music, and watch movies, etc. but I think about friggin strange stuff, read fantasy, and enjoy listening to and watching just about anything in the movie/music spectrum from eminem to wierd al and from shawshank redemption to office space to pirates of the caribbean. anyway, I'm studying to be an electrician, but can't forsee myself going anywhere with it, which sucks 'cause I'm an unemployed loser, in debt, overweight, and I feel like no matter what I do, my life's pretty much predestined to be in the shitter. I WANT A GOOD LIFE!!! IS THAT SO FRIGGIN' MUCH TO ASK?!??!!! *falls to knees, clasps hands, and looks to heaven in askance(looking truly pitiful)*
...*gets up and brushes self off*...
Sorry, had to vent there....I don't know where I was going with that, but point being, if anyone out there has a perspective philosophy-related job, which doesn't reqire fifteen friggin degrees *eyes Mr. fancy-schmancy chemical engineer, computer science guy back there (thumbs in buddy's general direction)* please feel free to get in touch. But due to my belief in my predetermined excrement-sucking existance, don't feel bad when you don't.
...crap.
Posted by: Nuthouse on April 30, 2004 05:02 AM what does it mean when my profile is actually
a "suicidal pedophile" ?
hmmm. i'm a college drop out, and haven't held any given job for more than 6 months. on the other hand, i've often grossed over $250'000 per annum, can read latin and sanskrit, and have been able to favorably impress mensa chicks.
guess it's my tie they like.
here's the deal (you can google for the dope): it's now recognized that there are at least 7 kinds of iq. one of which for instance is charisma. you can have a charismatic IQ of 180, and be a moron in everything else, and, guess what? you'll be a stellar entertainer or politician, and be able to hire other people to figure out the bills and run your empire.
another kind of IQ is 'artistic'. you can be a stellar artist, and not be able to play chess. yes, you. but general dynamics probably won't hire you for their research department.
me, i'm a 'spatial visualizer', a 'pattern recognizer / synthesist', 'lingual cunner' and 'overall lazy bum'. i've scored in the 270's plus on 'official' tests (based on the binet or the mega). my favorite pass-time is sitting under apple trees waiting for a grain of sand to fly 'up'. my favorite profession is sitting under apple trees waiting... etc.
if you can charm the socks of some chick (or some guy) you've got it made in the shade. if you're more the math or logic type, try inventing something and starting a corp. don't try running it: just sit around and think, and hire others to do the dirty work. likewise for art.
now, if you're spatial like me, you'd get into tangible 3-D stuff, like Avid or the indian erotic temple art; or if a pattern recognizer, maybe playing the stock market (it's paid the bills all these years)
two cents.
Posted by: idiot999 on May 4, 2004 01:38 PM
Congratulations, Victor!Your IQ score is 138
I'm also a Visionary Philosopher. I took the test last night around 12 o'clock when I was about to go to bed, as I came across it. I am Chinese and I live in China. Did any VP order the 15-page report? I would like to have a copy of it. Much thanks. My e-mail is victor714@163.net
Hi Folks,
Am recovering from the flu, got sick of playing "Bookworm" at Popcap Games -- decided to write my main squeeze an erotic sonnet, and realized I did not know the rhyming scheme for a sonnet.
(BTW, it is abab, cdcd, efef, gg. I think you do something with iambic pentameter, but I digress.)
Typed "How to Write A Sonnet" into Google, and the next thing you know, I'm into this IQ test pop-up which seemed to have easier questions than most of the IQ tests I have seen. So it beat both Bookworm AND Sonnet-writing 101 hands-down.
Since I was feeling all week like I'd been hit in the head with a bag of hammers, I was very pleased to discover I had a 136 IQ and I am a Visionary Philosopher. I'm like -- babee, what if I were healthy, would I be Queen of the World?? Of course, I did not know if 136 was a good score or not. I thought it might be one of those "sounds like a lot, then you find out it's in stones or kilograms instead of pounds" things.
And I was all ready to buy the $15 report so I could really wallow in how smart I had become, except that my credit card did not work, and suddenly the spell was broken and I found these thoughts in my head:
1. WHAT the HELL am I DOING???
2. Oh, right. Visionary Philosophers always weed themselves out of the gene pool via poor credit...
3. How did they know that erotic sonnet writers can be suckered into online IQ tests so easily?
And 4. WHAT the HELL did I just about do ONLINE with my CREDIT CARD???
Oh well, it was fun while it lasted!!! And you all sound like fascinating people, numerical qualifications aside...
I just took the IQ test and scored a 128 (Insightful Linguist). I'm not a very good linguist and prefer to work with numbers. Is it true that George Bush got a 92 on his IQ test?
Posted by: cmol on June 9, 2004 01:01 PMI don't believe the test is accurate. I recieved an IQ of 144 on it? Inconcievable. I also wonder how high the score on this test goes... maybe I should purposely get all of the questions wrong so that I would have an IQ equal to that of a rock. I'd say about 2.. maybe 3... you can kick a rock and it will comply (naturally). I doubt the test would go that low. If you could read they'd assume you have enough intelligence to recieve a 100? That's what my mother has according to this test. She can't use computers either, btw, but she can use a mouse. So I believe it is true that everyone here has a higher IQ than 100 because they can type, use a forum, and navigate through the internet. Oh, I like dark chocolate and I am a visionary philosopher. Not that it holds true... Fifteen dollars does seem like a waste.
Posted by: LittleRandomGirl on July 14, 2004 12:54 PMAgain, 144? I can't even type receive correctly...
Posted by: LittleRandomGirl on July 14, 2004 12:55 PMno matter what IQ test I take it always says that I am a Linguist. does that mean that I am just dumb or normal.
Posted by: keishaa on July 15, 2004 08:15 AMHas anyone besides me noticed how many VPs want to aquire the 15 page report from sombody else. I wonder if there is a frugal IQ test?
Posted by: VPrealist on July 30, 2004 06:30 AM