| « An open letter to the Democratic Party | Sacco and Spiegelman on Offensive Cartoons » |
02/20/06
I don't get Frank Miller sometimes.
The guy has a reputation for creating very subversive comic books. In the 1980s he wrote and drew Batman: The Dark Knight Returns, which, aside from being one of the first comics to question the morality of the superhero vigilante, contained biting criticism of the Reagan-era United States.
Fifteen years later, he revisited this theme with The Dark Knight Strikes Again, which was even more blatantly critical of American politics and media. The September 11 terrorist attacks, which occurred after Miller had already begun the story, lent it even more poignancy. Even if it wasn't originally envisioned as a criticism of the Bush administration's post-9/11 policies, it certainly looks that way in retrospect.
Miller took the opportunity to express his personal views on the terrorist attacks, unfiltered, in one of many benefit comic books published about the event. His two-page comic is as shocking as it is blunt.
Now I read in Newsarama that Miller is writing yet another Batman story. This time, he describes it as a propaganda story about Batman fighting terrorists: "And not to put too fine a point on it, it is a piece of propaganda. Batman kicks al-Qaeda’s ass."
Is this really Frank Miller talking?
Here's the discussion that then takes place between Miller and the panel moderator:
CB: Alright – so in calling it propaganda, how do you want your art to impact the war effort?
FM: I want us to win the war…
[very minor applause]
FM: Oh, only a couple? I know this is San Francisco, but come on! What, you want to lose?
I must say I'm surprised to hear this kind of reductionism coming from Frank Miller. He just doesn't seem to be the type that would buy into the rhetoric that we're in an inevitable war, and that the only possible outcomes are victory and defeat.
I think that a modern propaganda comic book is an interesting idea. It would be neat to see a story that simultaneously spoofs and pays homage to WWII-era propaganda comics. It would also be a cool opportunity to create some satire of current events (Team America: World Police comes to mind). But I simply can't believe that Frank Miller can make an earnest and sincere attempt at creating mere propaganda, and nothing more. Our world is too complex for that. Frank Miller is too complex for that. Either he's been seriously overestimated all these years, or he's got some surprises up his sleeve with this "propaganda" project.
4 comments
But, as I noted on a message board earlier this week, I just can't believe he's using jargon from the 60's TV show. Or has Robin really uttered "Holy Something-or-other" in the comics?
but in this instance the Caped Crusader has bitten off more than he can chew. Now he's being used by propagandists on both sides.
And there's video footage - available at the Irony Party of Australia's electronic pamphlet, here - http://www.ironyparty.org/ipa24thmar06.php - together with the revealing article BATMAN SNIPED WHILE FIGHTING AL QA'EDA IN IRAQ
Hello. My name is Daniel Antolin, a journalism student at Cal State University, Northridge, and I am writing a feature story about how comic books continue to be medium of propaganda in the contemporary world.
I was reading your web log and had a few questions I was hoping you could answer. I would greatly appreciate a response at your earliest convenience and any other thoughts about this issue you would like to share.
Thanks,
Daniel Antolin
danielroberttrue@hotmail.com
- The U.S. military is outsourcing the job of creating an Arab language comic book series set in the near future in the Middle East to reach Arab youth “in order to achieve long-term peace and stability” in the area. Their objectives are to educate these youths and provide them with role models.
What’s your take on this project? What sort of role models do you see the U.S. military creating for Arab youth in order to accomplish said goals? What are the U.S. military’s actual goals with this comic book series? Should they be doing this at all?
Do you agree with Frank Miller’s assessment that superheroes should be used to certain political agendas? Why or why not?
What do you think the objectives are of mainstream comic book puslishers who implement certain political points of view in their comics, if any?
Also Kyle, in order to use your comments, I am going to need your last name, age and job description. Being able to list your city and state of residence would also be good, however, please provide whatever information you feel comfortable providing.
Recent comments